The Eternal Cell
Review Date: 15 December 2015
Reviewed by:
Storm/Roto Grip staffer John Brockland
Style: Stroker Rev Rate: 280-310
PAP: 5.50" over and 1" up
The HYPER CELL has been one of the most
popular heavy oil situation bowling
balls on the market for the last couple
of years.
If there has been a down side to
it, it’s the fact that it can at times
rev and read too early on less than the
heaviest volume patterns and can leave
some bowlers struggling with the ball
burning too soon or other kinds of weird
carry issues from the ball trying to
start too early a move to the pocket
producing the wrong shot shape.
The subsequent release of the pearlized
HYPER CELL SKID provided an option in the
HP4 to help with some of those issues.
It’s pearl cover for sure creates
more length and a strong (though sometimes
too sharply strong) back end move that can
sometimes create control issues especially
on flatter patterns.
Roto Grip’s newly released ETERNAL CELL
bridges the gap between its two predecessors
and provides more versatility than either of
them.
It features the same strong rolling
asymmetrical NucleusTM core as
the rest of the Cell line but is wrapped
with a weaker solid coverstock than HYPER
CELL.
Compare a
grit
rating of 75 on the original ETERNAL
CELL and to a
grit
rating on the HYPER of 80.
At first glance, this situates the
ETERNAL more in the neighborhood of the
solid cover of the MENACE.
It is similar in composition.
However, the ETERNAL CELL comes at a
1500-grit factory polished finish that makes
it see the lane completely differently.
It produces cleaner and easier length
through the front and midlane than the HYPER
or the MENACE or the SINISTER and stronger
motion down lane than any of them as well.
Compared to the SKID the ETERNAL CELL
is still strong but produces more
controllable shape off the breakpoint.
I chose to go with a favorite, no-nonsense
pin up drilling on my ETERNAL CELL.
The specs on my layout come out to
55 x 5.5 x 45.
My first few excursions with the ETERNAL
CELL have been in league here in the STL –
typical wet/dry – in a center that tends to
have a little more volume in the middle than
most and where it’s always difficult to get
the ball to go through the pins well.
Even with its polished finish, the
ETERNAL had no problem negotiating volume.
It rolled true without ever skidding
out or “squirting” like some polished covers
do in heavier oil for me.
On the wet side of the wet/dry in
this center the ETERNAL allowed a little
more margin for error than any other shiny
ball would have – it produced flat tens
instead of two-pin combos.
Typically, in this particular
center, any shot that goes even a smidge
beyond exactly the right distance down lane
or that goes a hair too wide of the break
point before making a move to the pocket
results in an automatic ring ten.
Until
the dry side of the wet/dry got extreme, the
ETERNAL also created a little more
forgiveness than most other balls high
performance balls front to back at the break
point. The
ETERNAL’s motion is a very strong, rolling
and arcing hook.
I wouldn’t at all call it skid/flip.
Since the release of the ETERNAL, our STL
Sport League’s fall session this quarter has
been bowling on WTBA London (44 ft. and 26.5
mL).
The host center for this league has
original pro-anvilane and no matter what
pattern is put down it automatically plays a
few feet longer and a good deal tighter than
it otherwise should.
The ETERNAL CELL gave me a moderately
good look but my speed control had to be
perfect or it was in two-ten, four-six jail.
In this instance, Roto Grip’s new
hybrid CRITICAL at box surface has been a
far better choice for me than the polished
solid ETERNAL.
I haven’t had chance or any real
reason to try to manipulate the surface on
the ETERNAL yet, so I can’t say how amenable
to that it would be or how satisfactory the
performance results would be.
|
|