Dare Devil Trick
Review Date: 29 March 2017
Reviewed by:
Storm/Roto Grip staffer John Brockland
Style: Stroker Rev Rate: 280-310
PAP: 5.5" over and 1" up
One thing I have learned over a lifetime of bowling and several years now as a Storm and Roto Grip staffer, it’s never to write off an entire series of bowling balls simply because one release in the series turns out not to be a homerun for you. As I’ve reported elsewhere, the DARE DEVIL as been something of an enigma to me. I tried adding weight holes in a few different places and plugged and re-drilled it once changing the layout from a standard pin up to a standard pin under drilling. Though I’m seeing more of the nice ball motion now that I see others get from it, the DARE DEVIL still appears for me to be more of a niche ball than one widely and diversely usable.
The DARE DEVIL TRICK is a
different story.
It also features Roto Grip’s new
MadcapTM core but is wrapped with
a new RecklessTM Solid cover
which Roto Grip tech experts rank as a step
weaker than the Amped (pearl) cover on the
original DARE DEVIL.
Compared to the HAYWIRE,
the other solid in Roto Grip’s HP-3 line,
the core in the TRICK is rated just a pinch
stronger than the HAYWIRE’s Middle Role 70TM
core.
The RecklessTM solid cover
on the TRICK is significantly weaker than
the HAYWIRE’s 80HTM MicroBite
cover (the same cover as the original HYPER
CELL).
The TRICK has a slightly lower RG
(2.45 versus 2.50) than the HAYWIRE and
slightly less DIFF (.041 compared to .043).
Performance-wise the DARE
DEVIL TRICK for me is like an enhanced
DISTURBED.
The core comparison here are the same
as with the HAYWIRE since it has the same
core as the DISTURBED did.
The coverstock comparisons are a
little more significant.
The RecklessTM solid cover
is rated several increments stronger than
the 66MHTM
solid
cover that was featured on the DISTURBED.
What that translates to into on the
lane for me is that the DARE DEVIL TRICK –
with the drilling shown on the photo below
(60 x 5.5 x 70) – provides me a little
stronger revving behavior in the midlane
than the DISTURBED and, though still arcing
in shape, more sideways continuation
downlane.
Compared to a DISTURBED that I still
have with a similar layout (slightly shorter
pin to PAP and slightly larger drilling
angle), my TRICK is 2 to 3 boards stronger
overall on a typical STL house shot.
None of our centers in
the STL use today’s thicker viscous oils
like ICE or DEFY so I have no read yet on
how it chug through those.
I will say one thing I’ve noticed is
that the RecklessTM solid cover
does tend to lane shine rather quickly.
In the more recent
response-time vocabulary, I would
characterize the TRICK as a medium
response-time ball when it encounters
friction.
That all adds up to the TRICK being a
ball that can be useful also when
controllable predictable ball motion is
necessary.
I would recommend TRICK
to any style bowler as a reliable choice for
most medium to medium-heavy volume league or
tournament situations when you need a solid
in your hand but don’t want all-out, “big
ball” asymmetrical ball motion.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|